{"id":1203,"date":"2026-07-28T09:09:33","date_gmt":"2026-07-28T09:09:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=1203"},"modified":"2026-07-28T09:09:33","modified_gmt":"2026-07-28T09:09:33","slug":"biden-vs-mcconnell-a-tale-of-two-declines-part-two","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=1203","title":{"rendered":"Biden vs. McConnell: A Tale of Two Declines, Part Two"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>\n<p>Two octogenarian politicians at the apex of their power and influence have been in obvious physical and mental decline for years. In both cases, close aides of Joe Biden and Mitch McConnell circled the wagons to deflect physical and mental health questions and carry on as if everything were normal. Efforts to shield these people from public scrutiny have resulted in questions of cover-ups, as well as increased public cynicism regarding politicians in general.<\/p>\n<p>Read more <a href=\"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=1201\">The State of American Elections: For the Left, \u2018The Worse, the Better\u2019<\/a><\/p>\n<p>This is Part II of a two-part series that is a comparative analysis of documented decline, staff influence, and unresolved questions as it relates to the sorry cases of Joe Biden and Mitch McConnell. Part I covered Joe Biden. This part examines Mitch McConnell\u2019s decline.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mitch McConnell\u2019s Record<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Public decline signals.<\/strong> McConnell\u2019s two 2023 freezing episodes are the closest analogue to Biden\u2019s debate moment: he suddenly stopped speaking mid-remarks at a July 2023 press conference, went silent for 19\u201321 seconds, and had to be walked away from cameras by Senate colleagues, then froze again for more than 30 seconds five weeks later at an event in Kentucky, requiring help from people around him. Both incidents followed a March 2023 fall: he tripped after a Senate Leadership Fund event, was hospitalized with a concussion and a rib fracture, and didn\u2019t return to the Senate for roughly a month.<\/p>\n<p>The pattern continued past 2023: he had additional falls in 2024 and 2025 that injured his wrist and face, was hospitalized in February 2026 for more than a week with \u201cflu-like symptoms,\u201d and by April 2026 was being navigated around the Capitol by aides in a wheelchair. His office has consistently attributed each episode to something situational and non-cognitive\u2014the freezing spells to feeling \u201clightheaded,\u201d the falls to lingering effects of childhood polio\u2014an\u00a0explanatory pattern that, taken individually, is plausible, but that collectively has drawn the same skepticism Biden\u2019s \u201cbad cold\u201d and fatigue explanations did.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Staff visibly directing him in real time.<\/strong> The clearest documented instance of staff intervening in the moment, rather than managing the narrative afterward, came in May 2026: during a Senate Appropriations Committee hearing, McConnell attempted to wrap up the proceeding while several senators still had unasked questions, and an aide had to approach him and audibly instruct him, on a live microphone, that Senators Baldwin, Shaheen, and Kennedy still needed to speak. The moment was significant enough that President Trump publicly demanded that the aide be fired for making McConnell \u201clook completely out of it\u201d\u2014a notable reaction, since it reflects a Republican president reading the incident exactly the way Democratic critics read Biden\u2019s mic-cutoff moment: as staff visibly propping up a principal who could no longer run his own meeting.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Information control during the 2026 hospitalization.<\/strong> This is where McConnell\u2019s operation most resembles the \u201cPolitburo\u201d pattern on the Biden side, though the record here is thinner and the crisis is still unfolding. Since McConnell\u2019s June 14, 2026 hospitalization:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>His office initially said only that he was \u201creceiving excellent care,\u201d and it took until June 22\u2014more than a week later\u2014for staff to disclose he would miss votes that week, with spokesperson Robert Steurer declining to say whether McConnell remained hospitalized, whether staff had even communicated with him since he was found unconscious, or what his diagnosis was.<\/li>\n<li>Public 911 dispatch audio later surfaced showing paramedics responding to an \u201cunconscious\u201d person in \u201ccardiac arrest\u201d at McConnell\u2019s D.C. address the same morning he was hospitalized and administered CPR\u2014a materially different account than his staff\u2019s \u201creceiving excellent care\u201d framing, though McConnell was not named directly in the audio.<\/li>\n<li>Day-to-day operations are run by longtime aide Terry Carmack, described as \u201ccamera-shy\u201d and drawing a salary above $226,000, who, along with the rest of McConnell\u2019s office, has declined to answer specific questions about his condition.<\/li>\n<li>Even Senate leadership\u2019s own account has shifted under scrutiny: Majority Leader John Thune said June 15 that McConnell \u201csounded good\u201d on a call, but three weeks later Thune\u2019s office appeared to know nothing further about his condition before pushing out a fresh statement describing a \u201clengthy and substantive\u201d call that had reportedly just occurred\u2014a pattern of intermittent, hard-to-verify reassurances that mirrors how Biden\u2019s aides periodically vouched for his sharpness to a skeptical press corps.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>The institutional and structural layer.<\/strong> Unlike the presidency, there is no congressional equivalent of the 25th Amendment providing a mechanism for addressing a senator\u2019s incapacity\u2014short of resignation, election loss, or death, McConnell and his staff retain full control over what information about his condition is shared or withheld. This is a structural fact that makes staff gatekeeping considerably more consequential in the Senate. Layered onto this is the durable financial\/institutional machine built and controlled by McConnell over his 41 years in the U.S. Senate\u2014the Senate Leadership Fund and One Nation\u2014which continues to function as McConnell\u2019s enforcement arm for GOP primaries and discipline largely independent of his day-to-day capacity.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Bottom line on McConnell:<\/strong> the picture is now considerably fuller than \u201ctwo freeze-ups and a fall.\u201d There\u2019s a documented instance of an aide directing him mid-hearing in real time, a documented pattern of staff attributing each new physical episode to a non-cognitive cause, and\u2014during the current hospitalization\u2014a documented pattern of delayed, vague, and shifting disclosure from an office run day-to-day by a single long-tenured aide.<\/p>\n<p>What\u2019s still missing relative to the Biden side is the equivalent of sworn testimony or an insider book: everything above comes from press reporting, public records (911 audio), and on-camera moments, not from depositions or aides testifying under oath about what they concealed and why.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Part III: Side-By-Side Comparison<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>On <strong>public decline evidence<\/strong>, Biden\u2019s case rests on the debate performance, the Hur interview audio, and years of accumulated gaffe compilations, while McConnell\u2019s rests on two on-camera freeze-ups in 2023, the 2023 fall and concussion that preceded them, and the ongoing 2026 hospitalization.<\/p>\n<p>On the <strong>official explanation offered<\/strong>, Biden\u2019s camp pointed to a \u201cbad cold\u201d and general age-related fatigue alongside outright denials of decline, while McConnell\u2019s office attributed the freezing episodes to dehydration and fatigue and later cited a \u201cclean bill of health\u201d after testing.<\/p>\n<p>Read more <a href=\"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=1199\">The GOP Is Fighting to Hold the House. It Just Might Do It.<\/a><\/p>\n<p>On the <strong>formal investigative record<\/strong>, the asymmetry is stark: Biden\u2019s situation produced a genuine institutional record\u2014House Oversight depositions, subpoenas, a staff report, and a DOJ pardon-attorney inquiry\u2014while McConnell\u2019s situation has no equivalent. No depositions or subpoenas have targeted his inner circle.<\/p>\n<p>On the <strong>mechanism alleged for staff control<\/strong>, Biden\u2019s case is actually the broader of the two once you look past the autopen headline: a named inner circle (\u201cthe Politburo\u201d) controlling scheduling, information flow, medical gatekeeping, and public-facing damage control, with the autopen dispute as its single most legally consequential thread. McConnell\u2019s is more institutional and diffuse in a different way\u2014the Senate Leadership Fund and One Nation function as a disciplining apparatus, plus the general opacity around how Senate business is being managed by his staff during the 2026 hospitalization\u2014but it lacks an equivalent named, corroborated inner circle with its own book-length insider account.<\/p>\n<p>On <strong>aides asserting the Fifth Amendment<\/strong>, three former Biden aides did so; no equivalent has been reported on the McConnell side.<\/p>\n<p>On the <strong>legal consequence if true<\/strong>, Biden\u2019s scenario is contested territory\u2014most legal scholars maintain that autopen use doesn\u2019t void official acts regardless of the underlying capacity question. McConnell\u2019s isn\u2019t really analogous here, as Senate Leadership Fund spending is legal under current campaign finance law irrespective of his day-to-day capacity, so there\u2019s no equivalent \u201cinvalidation\u201d stakes.<\/p>\n<p>On the <strong>subject\u2019s own denial<\/strong>, Biden has been explicit and on the record, calling the staff-control suggestion \u201cridiculous and false.\u201d McConnell hasn\u2019t had occasion to issue a comparable denial, largely because no comparably specific allegation\u2014i.e., that staff exercised his formal powers without authorization\u2014has yet been leveled against him.<\/p>\n<p>And on the <strong>party response<\/strong>, Biden\u2019s team and DNC-aligned figures have mounted an institutional defense, while Senate GOP colleagues have generally minimized concerns about McConnell\u2014captured well by Mitt Romney\u2019s line that \u201cwe might lose 20 seconds a day from Mitch McConnell, but the other 86,380 seconds are just fine.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong>What\u2019s Genuinely Similar<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The similarities between the two are summarized below.<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Age and incumbency as structural rot.<\/strong> Both men held their positions into their eighties, well past the point where their own caucuses were privately discussing succession\u2014Biden inside the White House, McConnell inside Senate leadership circles going back to at least 2023.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Loyalist gatekeeping.<\/strong> In both cases, a small, long-tenured inner circle controlled access, information flow, and the public narrative about capacity. Biden\u2019s version is the more fully documented of the two\u2014a named group (\u201cthe Politburo\u201d: Donilon, Ricchetti, Reed, Klain, plus family-aligned aides Bernal and Tomasini) whose existence and function are corroborated by both journalists and sworn testimony. McConnell\u2019s equivalent circle is real but far less publicly mapped\u2014there\u2019s no comparable insider account naming names and describing a systematic information-control operation.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Institutional self-protection over disclosure.<\/strong> Both parties\u2019 establishments prioritized continuity of power and messaging discipline over transparent public accounting of their leader\u2019s condition\u2014this is the closest thing to a genuine \u201cUniparty\u201d behavioral parallel: not collusion between the two camps, but a shared institutional reflex to protect incumbency at the expense of candor.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Outside money as an independent power center.<\/strong> Biden\u2019s decision-making apparatus and McConnell\u2019s Senate Leadership Fund both illustrate how modern leadership offices function less as a single human\u2019s judgment and more as a networked operation that can run largely independent of the nominal principal\u2019s day-to-day condition\u2014a feature of the modern presidency and Senate leadership generally, not unique to either man.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><strong>What\u2019s Genuinely Different<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Here is a summary of the differences between the two:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Evidentiary maturity.<\/strong> The Biden case has moved from speculation to a formal, if contested, congressional investigatory record\u2014sworn depositions, subpoenas, and an insider book built on more than 200 interviews. The McConnell case has real documented instances of staff intervention (the May 2026 hearing incident, the pattern of shifting explanations for each health episode, the delayed and vague disclosure during the current hospitalization) but nothing at the level of sworn testimony describing what staff concealed and why. The gap between the two cases is narrower than it first appears, but it\u2019s still a gap, as McConnell\u2019s record is built from press reporting and public records while Biden\u2019s is from that plus an investigatory paper trail.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Nature of the alleged mechanism.<\/strong> Biden\u2019s is a discrete, falsifiable claim (did staff use a physical or digital signature device on specific documents without sign-off?). McConnell\u2019s is a diffuse claim about institutional power (does a leader\u2019s PAC network functionally run policy outcomes regardless of his day-to-day capacity?)\u2014a much harder claim to prove or disprove because outside-group influence is legal, normal, and largely undisputed as a feature of Senate leadership generally.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Legal stakes.<\/strong> Biden\u2019s alleged scenario touches presidential authority over pardons and executive orders\u2014among the highest-stakes unilateral powers in the constitutional system. McConnell\u2019s touches on campaign finance and legislative whipping\u2014significant, but constitutionally lower stakes and not currently the subject of a DOJ referral.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Current status.<\/strong> Biden\u2019s story is retrospective (his term has ended, and the investigation concerns a completed presidency). McConnell\u2019s is live and unresolved\u2014he remains hospitalized as of this writing, which means firm conclusions about \u201cwho is calling the shots\u201d are premature in a way they no longer are for Biden.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><strong>Closing Thoughts<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Biden and McConnell decline stories are genuinely parallel at the level of <strong><em>symptoms<\/em><\/strong> (public incapacity, institutional concealment reflexes, aging leadership past the point of full capacity) and the level of <strong><em>staff conduct<\/em><\/strong>. Both have documented instances of aides directly managing their principal in real time (the Vietnam mic cut and Politburo scheduling on one side, the May 2026 hearing intervention and wheelchair navigation on the other), and both have documented patterns of situational, non-cognitive explanations offered for each new episode of visible decline.<\/p>\n<p>Where they diverge sharply is at the level of <strong><em>proof<\/em><\/strong>: Biden\u2019s case has an actual paper trail\u2014depositions, subpoenas, Fifth Amendment invocations, a book built on more than 200 interviews\u2014that gives the \u201cwho was really in charge\u201d question real institutional weight, even though its ultimate legal conclusions remain contested.<\/p>\n<p>McConnell\u2019s case rests on strong circumstantial reporting (the May hearing incident, the delayed hospitalization disclosures, the 911 audio); it\u2019s a genuinely stronger case than \u201cjust inference\u201d at this point, but it still hasn\u2019t been tested under oath the way Biden\u2019s has.<\/p>\n<p>The last chapters of their stories have yet to be written. Preserving the illusion of competence, control, and legacies apparently trumps transparency and the public\u2019s right to know the truth for these two figures atop the American political system.<\/p>\n<p>Read more <a href=\"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=1197\">Morning Greatness: Trump to Meet With Ukraine\u2019s Zelensky<\/a><\/p>\n<p>It is long past time for age limits on elected officials.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Two octogenarian politicians at the apex of their power and influence have been in obvious physical and mental decline for years. In both cases\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1202,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[64],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1203","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-politics"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Biden vs. McConnell: A Tale of Two Declines, Part Two - Urban Economy news<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=1203\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Biden vs. McConnell: A Tale of Two Declines, Part Two - Urban Economy news\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Two octogenarian politicians at the apex of their power and influence have been in obvious physical and mental decline for years. In both cases\u2026\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=1203\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Urban Economy news\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-28T09:09:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"11 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/?p=1203#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/?p=1203\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/be7753cb687f443815cc81e8407f68ad\"},\"headline\":\"Biden vs. McConnell: A Tale of Two Declines, Part Two\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-28T09:09:33+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/?p=1203\"},\"wordCount\":2191,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/?p=1203#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/d28b9b6f664eccf886a23f5f5dffea76.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Politics\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/?p=1203#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/?p=1203\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/?p=1203\",\"name\":\"Biden vs. McConnell: A Tale of Two Declines, Part Two - Urban Economy news\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/?p=1203#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/?p=1203#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/d28b9b6f664eccf886a23f5f5dffea76.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-28T09:09:33+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/be7753cb687f443815cc81e8407f68ad\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/?p=1203#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/?p=1203\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/?p=1203#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/d28b9b6f664eccf886a23f5f5dffea76.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/d28b9b6f664eccf886a23f5f5dffea76.jpg\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":1440},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/?p=1203#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Biden vs. McConnell: A Tale of Two Declines, Part Two\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"Urban Economy news\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/be7753cb687f443815cc81e8407f68ad\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Biden vs. McConnell: A Tale of Two Declines, Part Two - Urban Economy news","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=1203","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Biden vs. McConnell: A Tale of Two Declines, Part Two - Urban Economy news","og_description":"Two octogenarian politicians at the apex of their power and influence have been in obvious physical and mental decline for years. In both cases\u2026","og_url":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=1203","og_site_name":"Urban Economy news","article_published_time":"2026-07-28T09:09:33+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"11 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=1203#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=1203"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/#\/schema\/person\/be7753cb687f443815cc81e8407f68ad"},"headline":"Biden vs. McConnell: A Tale of Two Declines, Part Two","datePublished":"2026-07-28T09:09:33+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=1203"},"wordCount":2191,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=1203#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/d28b9b6f664eccf886a23f5f5dffea76.jpg","articleSection":["Politics"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=1203#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=1203","url":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=1203","name":"Biden vs. McConnell: A Tale of Two Declines, Part Two - Urban Economy news","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=1203#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=1203#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/d28b9b6f664eccf886a23f5f5dffea76.jpg","datePublished":"2026-07-28T09:09:33+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/#\/schema\/person\/be7753cb687f443815cc81e8407f68ad"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=1203#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=1203"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=1203#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/d28b9b6f664eccf886a23f5f5dffea76.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/d28b9b6f664eccf886a23f5f5dffea76.jpg","width":2560,"height":1440},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=1203#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Biden vs. McConnell: A Tale of Two Declines, Part Two"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/","name":"Urban Economy news","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/#\/schema\/person\/be7753cb687f443815cc81e8407f68ad","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com"],"url":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1203","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1203"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1203\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/1202"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1203"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1203"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1203"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}