{"id":1450,"date":"2026-08-12T04:29:40","date_gmt":"2026-08-12T04:29:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=1450"},"modified":"2026-08-12T04:29:40","modified_gmt":"2026-08-12T04:29:40","slug":"newly-released-text-messages-show-fauci-knew-covid-vaccines-would-cause-miscarriages-but-pushed-the-shots-anyway","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=1450","title":{"rendered":"Newly Released Text Messages Show Fauci Knew COVID Vaccines Would Cause Miscarriages, But Pushed the Shots Anyway"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Dr. Anthony Fauci knew in January of 2021 that the experimental COVID \u201cvaccine\u201d could cause miscarriages but continued to push the shots on pregnant women, newly released phone records show.<\/p>

Read more Trump Secures Release of Former Marine Imprisoned in Russia For Over Four Years<\/a><\/p>\n

According to one analysis, miscarriages shot up to 82 percent in 2021 among women vaccinated with the COVID injection during the early months of their pregnancies.<\/p>\n

Senators Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), chairman of the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, and Rand Paul (R-Ky.), chairman of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, on Monday released the galling text chain messages obtained from Fauci\u2019s government-issued cellphone which was produced by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) on August 6.<\/p>\n

The text chain released Monday is dated from January 25-26, and features former NIAID Director Fauci, former CDC Director Rochelle Walensky, and former Surgeon General Vivek Murthy discussing pregnant women and the COVID-19 injections.<\/p>\n

In one of the text messages, Fauci laments that there is a \u201cmisconception\u201d in the public that the genetic shot could harm developing fetuses.<\/p>\n

In a follow-up text, he said that he \u201casked around a bit more\u201d and found out that \u201csince many people have significant cytokines storm and fever after the second dose, this theoretically could be associated with miscarriage in the 1st trimester.\u201d<\/p>\n

Walensky responded, \u201cDefinitely a good point, esp. after dose two.\u201d<\/p>\n

Murthy wrote back, \u201cthis is really helpful, thanks. I\u2019ve been hearing the concern about the mRNA causing mutations in the developing fetus, as well. That\u2019s a really good point re the cytokine storm post second dose.\u201d<\/p>\n

After the World Health Organization (WHO) put out a statement advising pregnant women not to take the Moderna vaccine because of \u201clack of data,\u201d the trio discussed what to tell the media.<\/p>\n

Fauci said he would tell reporters that they hadn\u2019t seen any red flags and the risks of the getting the virus outweighed the risks of the COVID shots so pregnant women should have the choice.<\/p>\n

The rest of the texts from the conversation can be found .<\/p>\n

All three of the health officials went on to recommend the novel vaccine to pregnant women with no restrictions.<\/p>\n

Senator Johnson listed some of their public statements in a press release:<\/p>\n

Feb. 3, 2021<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013\u00a0NIAID Director Dr. Anthony Fauci:<\/strong>\u00a0\u201c[FDA] have found thus far and we have to be careful but thus far no red flags about that, about pregnant women.\u201d<\/p>\n

Aug. 11, 2021 \u2013\u00a0<\/strong>CDC\u2019s Sascha Ellington<\/strong>:\u00a0<\/strong>\u201cWe are not seeing a signal of safety concerns of the vaccine in pregnancy \u2026 This vaccine can prevent Covid-19, and so that\u2019s the primary benefit.\u201d<\/p>\n

Aug. 30, 2021 \u2013\u00a0<\/strong>NIAID Director Dr. Anthony Fauci<\/strong>:<\/strong>\u00a0\u201cWell, are the vaccines safe?\u201d \u2026 \u201c10s and 10s and 10s of thousands of women who have been followed by the CDC, who have been vaccinated when they were pregnant, there\u2019s no indication whatsoever that there\u2019s any increase of any adverse issues in a pregnant woman who was vaccinated compared to a pregnant woman who wasn\u2019t vaccinated \u2026 it\u2019s pretty clear that pregnant women should get vaccinated.\u201d<\/p>\n

Sept. 29, 2021 \u2013\u00a0<\/strong>CDC Director Rochelle Walensky<\/strong>:<\/strong>\u00a0\u201cCDC strongly recommends COVID-19 vaccination either before or during pregnancy because the benefits of vaccination outweigh known or potential risks,\u201d the agency said in a health alert \u2026 Walensky told a White House COVID-19 briefing that studies show COVID-19 vaccines are safe for pregnant women.<\/p>\n

Feb. 1, 2022 \u2013\u00a0Surgeon General Dr. Vivek Murthy:<\/strong>\u00a0\u201cIt\u2019s all the more important for you to get vaccinated if you are pregnant or if you are trying to become pregnant \u2026 The data points show that the vaccines are safe during these various stages before and during pregnancy \u2026 They found generally that anytime during your pregnancy is actually fine [to get the vaccine], and that\u2019s why the recommendation is just to get it.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Dr. James Thorp, an OB\/GYN and maternal-fetal medicine specialist, vocally opposed administering the shots pregnant women during the vaccine rollout.<\/p>\n

In an August 2022 interview, Thorp said that he had seen a massive spike in fetal death and adverse pregnancy outcomes after the mass vaccination campaign began.<\/p>

Read more Former NBA Player Sends WNBA Formal Notice of His Decision to Enter 2027 WNBA Draft<\/a><\/p>\n

Dr. Thorp told Epoch Times<\/em> he had practiced obstetrics for over 42 years and saw 6,000\u20137,000 high-risk OB patients a year.<\/p>\n

The obstetrician declared that the use of the experimental COVID vaccines on expectant mothers \u201cbroke all the rules.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cWe have always been guided by that principle, that longstanding, six millennia principle\u2014the golden rule of pregnancy\u2014you never, ever<\/em> use an investigational drug, a new substance, a new drug, a new vaccine\u2014even if there\u2019s a potential benefit,\u201d he said. \u201cYou don\u2019t ever<\/em> use a new substance in pregnancy.\u201d<\/p>\n

Thorp said that in his practice, he had seen a \u201csignificant increase\u201d in problems, including \u201cextraordinarily abnormal menstrual periods\u201d before pregnancy.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe vaccine I\u2019m very concerned about and I do believe that in pregnancy, it\u2019s contraindicated,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

He told Epoch Times<\/em> that his attempts to disclose these adverse events had been hampered by the imposition of gag orders on physicians and nurses that were imposed in September 2021.<\/p>\n

In December 2022, Thorp testified that the spike in fetal death and adverse pregnancy outcomes he\u2019d observed in his practice was \u201ccatastrophic.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cWhat I have seen in my medical practice has been a substantial increase in infertility, miscarriage, fetal death and fetal malformation. What we have seen is catastrophic,\u2019\u00a0 Thorp said during Senator Ron Johnson\u2019s Roundtable discussion on the COVID-19 Vaccine injuries on Dec. 7, 2022.<\/p>\n

Thorp published an open letter to the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology<\/em> on January 12, 2022 rebutting a paper published in the New England Journal of Medicine in June 2021, showing a low incidence of miscarriages among vaccinated pregnant women.<\/p>\n

He argued: \u201cbecause 700 of the 827 pregnant women in the study received their COVID-19 injection in the third trimester (after 28 weeks), those 700 should be excluded from the denominator used to calculate a 12.6 percent (104\/827) spontaneous abortion rate (defined as occurring before 20 weeks). The actual spontaneous abortion rate would then be 82% (104\/127).\u201d<\/p>\n

An analysis of a Pfizer document called \u201cCumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Reports\u201d found an 87.5 percent death rate.<\/p>\n

\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n