{"id":1483,"date":"2026-08-13T07:37:25","date_gmt":"2026-08-13T07:37:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=1483"},"modified":"2026-08-13T07:37:25","modified_gmt":"2026-08-13T07:37:25","slug":"thune-vs-cornyn-a-retrospective-on-the-2024-senate-majority-leader-race","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=1483","title":{"rendered":"Thune vs. Cornyn: A Retrospective on the 2024 Senate Majority Leader Race"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>\n<p>John Thune\u2019s ascension to Senate Majority Leader over John Cornyn in November 2024 is often explained in the legacy media as a matter of temperament and fundraising prowess. The more consequential variable was <strong><em>timing<\/em><\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>Read more <a href=\"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=1481\">Who\u2019s Been Destroying Norms?<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Thune\u2019s Senate class does not face voters again until 2028; Cornyn faced the music in 2026. That single fact, more than any policy distinction between the two men, determined which of them could absorb the political cost of leading a Senate majority that has repeatedly frustrated the America First wing of the party\u2014most visibly through Thune\u2019s refusal to force the SAVE America Act past a filibuster he lacks the votes to sustain. The South Dakota GOP\u2019s near-miss censure vote in June 2026 was the clearest test of that arrangement to date, and it held, confirming that Thune\u2019s insulation from his own base was durable enough to survive an organized attempt to break it.<\/p>\n<p>The documented record\u2014the leadership vote itself, the candidates\u2019 donor profiles, the censure resolution, and its defeat\u2014supports this reading without much interpretive strain.<\/p>\n<p>A further claim can be made that Thune\u2019s elevation was not simply a fortunate alignment of Senate class and electability but the product of deliberate institutional engineering by the McConnell network, executed specifically to install a leader shielded from base backlash until 2028. That claim is very plausible, consistent with the available evidence on fundraising infrastructure and staff continuity, but impossible to confirm from public sources.<\/p>\n<p>In the analysis that follows, this claim is treated as speculative rather than reported as established fact.<\/p>\n<p><strong>THE PROCESS<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>McConnell announced in February 2024 he\u2019d step down from leadership after 17 years. Cornyn, Rick Scott, and Thune were the three official candidates, chosen by the Senate Republican Conference on a secret ballot on November 13, 2024. Thune beat Cornyn 29-24 on the second ballot after Scott was eliminated in the first round. The night before the vote, candidates made closed-door pitches to the conference in a session senators described as \u201cenergetic\u201d but not a debate. Trump deliberately withheld an endorsement\u2014sources indicated he doubted Scott could actually win the internal vote\u2014but he still shaped the race by publicly demanding the winner support recess appointments to speed Cabinet confirmations.<\/p>\n<p><strong>MAJOR FACTORS IN THE SELECTION\/ELECTION<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Below are some of the major factors that influenced the Republican Senate majority leader selection\/election process.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Small State vs. Texas, and the Name-Recognition Asymmetry<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>This cuts opposite the intuitive direction. Cornyn had the donor-rich home base and decades of national fundraising infrastructure\u2014he raised $17.2 million for GOP incumbents and candidates in the leadership-race cycle, including through the Cornyn Victory Committee\u2014but that same high profile as a Texas power broker and former NRSC chair made him a bigger, more visible target for the \u201cestablishment RINO\u201d charge from the MAGA base.<\/p>\n<p>Thune\u2019s relative anonymity outside South Dakota\u2014a small, safe, low-media-market state\u2014meant he carried less baggage in the eyes of the broader conference and less name-ID for outside groups to weaponize against him ahead of the vote. He also wasn\u2019t shy about matching Cornyn dollar-for-dollar in an insider sense: Thune transferred $4 million to the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) in September 2024, the largest single-senator contribution to the committee in history at that point, breaking a record he himself had set in 2016.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Both Have Anti-Trump Paper Trails\u2014and Establishment, Not Grassroots, Networks<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Thune\u2019s rift with Trump dates to his 2016 call for Pence to replace Trump atop the ticket after the Access Hollywood tape, and he voted to acquit Trump in the 2021 impeachment trial while still saying Trump\u2019s conduct \u201cundermine[d] faith in our election system.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Cornyn has a parallel record as a McConnell-aligned institutionalist. Both men\u2019s institutional support in the leadership race came from conference insiders and leadership-adjacent figures\u2014NRSC Chairman Senator Steve Daines (R-MT) privately urged colleagues to back Thune, and Thune\u2019s public endorsers included North Dakotan Kevin Cramer, who cited decades-long personal ties rather than ideological alignment\u2014while grassroots MAGA energy that cycle visibly rallied around Scott instead, with online campaigns warning that both Cornyn and Thune \u201cwould threaten Trump\u2019s agenda.\u201d That\u2019s the tell: the actual base preference was neither Thune nor Cornyn.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Donor Ties\u2014Documented Disparity<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>This is where the record is richest, and it favors the thesis that Cornyn\u2019s exposure was more acute:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Cornyn<\/strong>: By spring 2024, he\u2019d raised $5.6 million in Q1 alone through his joint fundraising committee and used a joint fundraising committee (Cornyn Victory) that raised roughly $20 million, a quarter of which flowed to the NRSC. His donor base skews heavily oil-and-gas\u2014ConocoPhillips CEO Ryan Lance, Kinder Morgan\u2019s Richard and Nancy Kinder, Energy Transfer\u2019s Kelcy Warren, and Devon Energy\u2019s Clay Gaspar are all recurring maximum-or-near-maximum donors, consistent with his record as a Senate ally of the oil industry on LNG exports and EV-incentive opposition.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Thune<\/strong>: He was the only one of the three leadership candidates to establish his own personal Super PAC (New Heights Action) in 2024, mirroring McConnell\u2019s own model, and it pulled in over $3 million in a single quarter, including $1 million from Blackstone\u2019s Stephen Schwarzman. An INET analysis found his 2023-24 fundraising underwent an abrupt shift toward megadonor money as he ascended toward leadership, and his lobbyist\/staffer revolving-door network closely mirrors McConnell\u2019s\u2014dominated by big-business and industry-side firms rather than labor or grassroots-adjacent groups. Note that the INET analysis was prescient with its aptly named announcement: \u201cLeadership in the Senate: New Boss Same as the Old Boss?\u201d<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The bottom line is that Cornyn\u2019s donor ties were older, more industry-concentrated (oil\/gas specifically), and more closely tied to a state donor class that draws outsized national scrutiny, whereas Thune\u2019s megadonor pivot happened more quietly and more recently, coinciding with\u2014not preceding\u2014his leadership ambitions. This is a case where \u201cless name recognition\u201d and \u201cless scrutinized donor profile\u201d are two sides of the same coin.<\/p>\n<p><strong>The McConnell Factor<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Thune\u2019s replication of McConnell\u2019s personal-Super-PAC model, plus the near-identical revolving-door lobbyist network, is the strongest documented evidence of institutional continuity. This supports a \u201cMcConnell\u2019s preferred successor\u201d reading even though McConnell formally declined to endorse anyone in the race.<\/p>\n<p>The credible-but-unconfirmed layer is this: reporting doesn\u2019t establish that McConnell or his staff directly whipped votes for Thune, but the fundraising-apparatus mimicry and personnel overlap are consistent with a soft institutional handoff rather than a genuinely open contest. Their continued close relationship\u2014including detailed phone calls during McConnell\u2019s 2026 hospitalization\u2014is documented but doesn\u2019t by itself prove pre-2024 coordination; that inference is yours to draw explicitly as speculative if you use it.<\/p>\n<p>Read more <a href=\"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=1479\">\u2018Horrifically Bad\u2019: Newly Released Docs Reveal Secret FBI Operation to Discredit Evidence of Biden Family Corruption<\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>2026 vs. 2028 Reelection Timing<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Cornyn faced reelection in 2026 and was soundly defeated in the primary by Texas State Attorney General Ken Paxton. This may have even been predicted via internal polls and tipped the balance to Thune. On the other hand, Thune wasn\u2019t up until 2028.<\/p>\n<p>In retrospect, Cornyn\u2019s 2026 primary threat proved real and expensive\u2014his primary fight against Paxton became one of the most expensive in Texas history, with outside groups like the Trump-adjacent Texans for a Conservative Majority super PAC spending heavily on his behalf\u2014which retroactively validates the 2024 electoral-math logic: whoever won the gavel would immediately become an America First target, and Cornyn couldn\u2019t afford that fight and a primary in the same two-year window. Thune could because many voters have short memories.<\/p>\n<p><strong>THE CENSURE VOTE<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Thune censure resolution vote by the South Dakota Republican Party reinforces the thesis that reelection timing was a major factor. The SD GOP Resolutions Committee approved a censure resolution against Thune over his refusal to force the SAVE America Act through via a talking filibuster or rules change, with Thune\u2019s own defense being: \u201cWe don\u2019t have the votes, either to proceed to a talking filibuster nor to sustain one if we got one\u2026 That\u2019s just a function of math.\u201d  explicitly conditioned the censure\u2019s withdrawal on the SAVE America Act actually being signed into law.<\/p>\n<p>On the SDGOP State Convention floor on June 26, the censure failed on a voice vote, with the majority of delegates voting against it amid applause and whistling from the floor. Opponents\u2019 stated rationale was that censuring their own majority leader \u201cwould only help Democrats.\u201d Democracy Docket framed the outcome as showing \u201cthe limits of MAGA pressure even in a deep-red state.\u201d Proponents maintained that the floor discussion was not balanced (pro-Thune speakers gamed the time allotted).<\/p>\n<p>That result is exactly the mechanism that reinforces that <strong><em>timing<\/em><\/strong> of reelection campaigns was the major deciding factor: institutional\/party-loyalty logic overriding grassroots anger, in the one venue where Thune was most personally exposed, two years before he next faces voters\u2014buying him the runway to let 2026 fade before 2028.<\/p>\n<p><strong>SPECULATION: THE CASE FOR PREMEDITATION<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>A plausible theory is that Thune and McConnell coordinated a deliberate 2024 succession plan anticipating the 2026-vs-2028 shield, rather than the timing being a fortunate byproduct of Thune\u2019s Senate class. Let us examine that possibility.<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong> The timing precondition existed before the contest, not because of it.<\/strong> Senate classes are fixed by the Constitution, not chosen by candidates. Thune is a Class III senator, having been elected in 2022 and next facing voters in 2028; Cornyn is a Class II senator, having been elected in 2020 and next facing voters in 2026. The point is: neither man picked his own election year. What <strong><em>is<\/em><\/strong> choosable is who a departing leader (or the leader\u2019s network) chooses to elevate, and someone assembling a succession plan in 2022\u201323\u2014well before McConnell\u2019s February 2024 retirement announcement\u2014would have known exactly which candidates carried which electoral clocks. If McConnell-aligned operatives were already thinking several cycles ahead about how to insulate the next leader from an America First backlash, Thune\u2019s class placement wasn\u2019t a lucky accident to discover in 2024\u2014it was knowable years in advance.<\/li>\n<li><strong> The fundraising posture shift front-runs the vacancy.<\/strong> The INET analysis you already have shows Thune\u2019s donor profile pivoted sharply toward megadonors in the 2023\u201324 cycle, coinciding with\u2014not following\u2014his ascension effort, and he was the only 2024 candidate to stand up a personal leadership Super PAC modeled explicitly on McConnell\u2019s own vehicle. Standing up a Schwarzman-funded PAC isn\u2019t a two-week improvisation; the infrastructure (legal formation, staff, initial donor commitments) typically takes months to arrange, meaning the apparatus was likely being built well before McConnell\u2019s public February 2024 announcement\u2014consistent with insiders having advance knowledge that a vacancy was coming.<\/li>\n<li><strong> The revolving-door overlap is a network signature, not a coincidence.<\/strong> The near-identical lobbyist\/staffer networks between Thune and McConnell\u2014dominated by the same industry-side firms\u2014suggest shared personnel infrastructure, which is how institutional continuity actually gets executed in practice, not through public statements but through staff continuity. A \u201cplan\u201d in Washington rarely looks like a memo; it looks like the same 15 people staying employed across two offices.<\/li>\n<li><strong> McConnell\u2019s public neutrality is exactly what a soft handoff would look like.<\/strong> McConnell declined to endorse anyone, which is consistent with <strong><em>either<\/em> <\/strong>genuine neutrality <strong><em>or<\/em> <\/strong>a leader who didn\u2019t need to endorse publicly because the groundwork (fundraising infrastructure, staff networks, whip operation via Daines) was already doing the work quietly. The absence of a public signal isn\u2019t evidence against coordination\u2014it\u2019s what coordination designed to survive MAGA scrutiny would necessarily look like.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><strong>CONCLUDING THOUGHTS<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The \u201cengineered succession\u201d reading isn\u2019t necessary to explain the outcome. The documented record supports a more mundane and more defensible conclusion: Thune won because he was structurally better positioned to survive the job, not necessarily because anyone plotted a multi-year installation.<\/p>\n<p>Based on the <strong><em>documented<\/em><\/strong> evidence available, here are the likely reasons, in order of evidentiary weight:<\/p>\n<p><strong>Electoral clock.<\/strong> Thune wasn\u2019t up until 2028; Cornyn faced voters in 2026. This alone explains why the conference could hand Thune the base-alienating parts of the job\u2014stalling the SAVE Act, resisting filibuster reform\u2014without immediately costing him his seat. Cornyn\u2019s subsequent primary fight against Paxton confirmed the risk was real, not hypothetical.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Lower exposure, not lower entanglement.<\/strong> Thune\u2019s donor base is just as establishment-coded as Cornyn\u2019s, but it was newer, less concentrated in a single scrutinized industry, and attached to a senator with far less national name recognition. Cornyn\u2019s decades of oil-and-gas money and Texas donor-class visibility made him the easier target; Thune\u2019s megadonor pivot happened quietly and late enough to avoid the same level of scrutiny going into the vote.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Fundraising capacity mattered on its own terms.<\/strong> Thune\u2019s record NRSC transfer and top-ranked campaign war chest gave him a straightforward, non-conspiratorial case for the job: he could raise money for colleagues, which is most of what a conference actually wants from its leader.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Institutional continuity, not necessarily coordination.<\/strong> The overlap between Thune\u2019s and McConnell\u2019s donor and lobbyist networks is real and documented. This is a convergent interest\u2014ambitious senators build the same kind of infrastructure McConnell built because that infrastructure is what wins the job.<\/p>\n<p><strong>The censure vote validates the strategy after the fact.<\/strong> Whether or not 2028 insulation was the deliberate goal in 2024, it functioned as one in June 2026, when the SD GOP\u2019s own delegates declined to escalate against him. The shield worked, regardless of whether anyone engineered it.<\/p>\n<p>Nevertheless, just because the documented evidence doesn\u2019t support the premeditated theory does not mean it can be discarded out of hand. Since the Republican leadership has been a controlled\u2014and highly secretive\u2014operation for decades, Occam\u2019s razor would indicate that Thune\u2019s succession was well planned but potentially miscalculated because the SAVE Act\u2019s fate could very well determine his own political future in 2028.<\/p>\n<p>Read more <a href=\"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=1473\">Moderate Dem Narrowly Beats Socialist Francesca Hong in Wisconsin\u2019s Democrat Gubernatorial Primary After Late Night USB Glitch<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>John Thune\u2019s ascension to Senate Majority Leader over John Cornyn in November 2024 is often explained in the legacy media as a matter of temperament and\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1482,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[79],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1483","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-senate"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Thune vs. Cornyn: A Retrospective on the 2024 Senate Majority Leader Race - Urban Economy news<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=1483\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Thune vs. Cornyn: A Retrospective on the 2024 Senate Majority Leader Race - Urban Economy news\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"John Thune\u2019s ascension to Senate Majority Leader over John Cornyn in November 2024 is often explained in the legacy media as a matter of temperament and\u2026\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=1483\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Urban Economy news\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-08-13T07:37:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"12 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/?p=1483#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/?p=1483\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/be7753cb687f443815cc81e8407f68ad\"},\"headline\":\"Thune vs. Cornyn: A Retrospective on the 2024 Senate Majority Leader Race\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-08-13T07:37:25+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/?p=1483\"},\"wordCount\":2317,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/?p=1483#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/3c985b36b89c547e28dea04c5f7d4075-scaled.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Senate\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/?p=1483#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/?p=1483\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/?p=1483\",\"name\":\"Thune vs. Cornyn: A Retrospective on the 2024 Senate Majority Leader Race - Urban Economy news\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/?p=1483#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/?p=1483#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/3c985b36b89c547e28dea04c5f7d4075-scaled.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-08-13T07:37:25+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/be7753cb687f443815cc81e8407f68ad\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/?p=1483#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/?p=1483\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/?p=1483#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/3c985b36b89c547e28dea04c5f7d4075-scaled.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/3c985b36b89c547e28dea04c5f7d4075-scaled.jpg\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":1335},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/?p=1483#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Thune vs. Cornyn: A Retrospective on the 2024 Senate Majority Leader Race\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"Urban Economy news\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/be7753cb687f443815cc81e8407f68ad\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Thune vs. Cornyn: A Retrospective on the 2024 Senate Majority Leader Race - Urban Economy news","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=1483","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Thune vs. Cornyn: A Retrospective on the 2024 Senate Majority Leader Race - Urban Economy news","og_description":"John Thune\u2019s ascension to Senate Majority Leader over John Cornyn in November 2024 is often explained in the legacy media as a matter of temperament and\u2026","og_url":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=1483","og_site_name":"Urban Economy news","article_published_time":"2026-08-13T07:37:25+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"12 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=1483#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=1483"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/#\/schema\/person\/be7753cb687f443815cc81e8407f68ad"},"headline":"Thune vs. Cornyn: A Retrospective on the 2024 Senate Majority Leader Race","datePublished":"2026-08-13T07:37:25+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=1483"},"wordCount":2317,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=1483#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/3c985b36b89c547e28dea04c5f7d4075-scaled.jpg","articleSection":["Senate"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=1483#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=1483","url":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=1483","name":"Thune vs. Cornyn: A Retrospective on the 2024 Senate Majority Leader Race - Urban Economy news","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=1483#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=1483#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/3c985b36b89c547e28dea04c5f7d4075-scaled.jpg","datePublished":"2026-08-13T07:37:25+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/#\/schema\/person\/be7753cb687f443815cc81e8407f68ad"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=1483#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=1483"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=1483#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/3c985b36b89c547e28dea04c5f7d4075-scaled.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/3c985b36b89c547e28dea04c5f7d4075-scaled.jpg","width":2560,"height":1335},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=1483#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Thune vs. Cornyn: A Retrospective on the 2024 Senate Majority Leader Race"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/","name":"Urban Economy news","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/#\/schema\/person\/be7753cb687f443815cc81e8407f68ad","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com"],"url":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1483","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1483"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1483\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/1482"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1483"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1483"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1483"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}