{"id":162,"date":"2026-05-29T07:44:39","date_gmt":"2026-05-29T07:44:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=162"},"modified":"2026-05-29T07:44:39","modified_gmt":"2026-05-29T07:44:39","slug":"why-the-save-act-matters","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=162","title":{"rendered":"Why the SAVE Act Matters"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

American self-governance rests on one indispensable foundation: that elections reflect the will of eligible citizens, counted accurately and administered transparently. Republicans and election integrity advocates argue that this foundation has been progressively undermined\u2014not necessarily by a single grand conspiracy, but by a systemic pattern of loosened safeguards, dirty voter rolls, exploitable mail-ballot systems, and aggressive Democrat opposition to the audits and reforms that would resolve public doubt once and for all.<\/p>\n

Read more The Next DNI Must Finish the Job and Eliminate the ODNI<\/a><\/p>\n

The Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act\u2014which polls at roughly 80 percent public support\u2014would require documentary proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote in federal elections. To its advocates, it is the minimum logical response to documented vulnerabilities in the registration and voting system. To its opponents, it is voter suppression. The fight over that characterization is itself a revealing indicator of where the parties stand on the fundamental question: do you want to know or don\u2019t you? And why?<\/p>\n

Let\u2019s examine the subject in some detail.<\/p>\n

Note: The below analysis was written from a Republican\/election-integrity advocate perspective. Where allegations are unconfirmed or contested, they are labeled as such.<\/p>\n

Part I: Confirmed and Documented Problems<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Dirty Voter Rolls\u2014A National Scandal<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    The evidence that American voter rolls are riddled with ineligible registrations is not in dispute. The only dispute is over whether they should be fixed.<\/p>\n

    The DOJ\u2019s Civil Rights Division, under Assistant AG Harmeet Dhillon, reviewed voter rolls from just 16 voluntarily cooperating Republican-leaning states and found tens of thousands of apparent noncitizens and hundreds of thousands of dead people still registered to vote. The administration subsequently sued 29 states\u2014including blue-state heavyweights California and New York and swing states Arizona and Georgia\u2014to compel production of voter roll data under the National Voter Registration Act and the Help America Vote Act.<\/p>\n

    In California, a review of voter rolls found registrations tied to P.O. boxes and individuals listed as 125 years old. In Colorado, a lawsuit forced the purge of 372,000 ineligible registrations. In Michigan, dead voters have been documented\u2014some of whom show records of in-person voting after their deaths. In Oregon, similar anomalies have been reported. Judicial Watch has documented tens of thousands of names removed from rolls in multiple states, often only after litigation\u2014raising the obvious question of why states resisted cleanup in the first place.<\/p>\n

    The consistent pattern: Republicans seek cleanup to remove any possibility that unauthorized people are voting in elections through fraud associated with ballot harvesting. Democrats sue to prevent it for the purposes of preventing disenfranchising eligible voters (with the unspoken reason to enable Democrat ballot harvesting).<\/p>\n

      \n
    1. Noncitizen Voting\u2014Prosecuted Cases<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      Noncitizen voting is not a hypothetical. It is documented, prosecuted, and ongoing.<\/p>\n

      In Philadelphia, ICE and the FBI arrested Mahady Sacko, an illegal alien from Mauritania, for voting in seven federal elections dating to 2008\u2014despite a 2002 removal order. In Coldwater, Kansas, Mayor Joe Ceballos\u2014a legal permanent resident from Mexico\u2014resigned and faced charges after voting in multiple elections. These are not isolated cases; they are confirmed examples of a vulnerability that Republicans argue the SAVE Act would directly address.<\/p>\n

        \n
      1. Mail Ballot Fraud\u2014A Proven Mechanism<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        Democrats and their media allies spent years insisting mail ballot fraud is vanishingly rare. The prosecution record tells a different story\u2014of widespread, real, and exploitable vulnerabilities (over 1400 cases in this database).<\/p>\n

        In Pennsylvania, a grand jury indicted three Democrats\u2014Mohammed Nurul Hasan, Mohammed Munsur Ali, and Mohammed Rafikul Islam\u2014for attempting to steal the 2021 mayoral election in Millbourne. Using Pennsylvania\u2019s online voter registration portal (PAOVR), they changed the registered addresses of nearly three dozen non-residents to Millbourne addresses, requested mail ballots on their behalf, filled them out, and submitted them. The system\u2019s vulnerability: anyone with basic personal information about a voter could modify that voter\u2019s registration and divert their ballot to any address in the world. The candidate lost anyway\u2014but the mechanism worked. The \u201csafeguards\u201d the AP assured voters existed did not stop it.<\/p>\n

        In Minnesota, a duo pleaded guilty to flooding an election with fraudulent ballots. In Connecticut, a state employee was arrested for switching Republican voters\u2019 registrations to Democrat without their knowledge. Stacey Abrams\u2019 Fair Fight organization was forced to pay the largest campaign finance violation fine in Georgia history.<\/p>\n

          \n
        1. ActBlue\u2014Active Congressional Investigation with Significant Red Flags<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

          This is not an allegation. This is an active, documented federal investigation backed by congressional subpoenas.<\/p>\n

          The House Judiciary, Oversight, and Administration Committees released a joint interim report in April 2026 finding that five current and former ActBlue employees\u2014including its general counsel (fired), legal department personnel, and VP of customer service\u2014collectively invoked the Fifth Amendment 146 times during depositions. Not once or twice. 146 times. Not a single substantive question was answered.<\/p>\n

          The report also found that ActBlue made its fraud-prevention rules more lenient<\/em> twice during the 2024 election cycle and that internal training materials directed fraud-prevention staff to \u201clook for reasons to accept contributions\u201d rather than scrutinize them. The entire legal and compliance team\u2014every member\u2014had resigned, been fired, or gone on extended leave by March 2025, in the months immediately following the election.<\/p>\n

          The New York Times<\/em>\u2014not a right-wing outlet\u2014reported on the foreign donation concerns. Former Biden White House Counsel Dana Remus, working at ActBlue\u2019s law firm Covington, reportedly warned that ActBlue\u2019s CEO may have misrepresented facts to Congress. House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan summarized the irony: Democrats spent a decade accusing Trump of foreign campaign collusion. The evidence of foreign money flowing into Democrat fundraising infrastructure is now the subject of formal congressional investigation.<\/p>\n

            \n
          1. Fulton County, Georgia\u2014Missing Evidence, FBI Raids, and Unanswered Questions<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

            Fulton County has become the symbolic epicenter of 2020 election integrity concerns, and for documented reasons.<\/p>\n

            In January 2026, the Georgia State Election Board revealed that investigators could not locate a single \u201czero tape\u201d from Fulton County\u2019s 148 early voting machines from the 2020 general election. Zero tapes are the legal documents that certify each ballot tabulator began counting at zero\u2014preventing preloaded votes or test data from being counted as real votes. Their absence does not prove fraud. But their absence also cannot be explained away. A December 2025 admission by Fulton County\u2019s attorney confirmed that more than 100 tabulator closing tapes\u2014representing roughly 315,000 votes\u2014were never signed by poll workers as required by law.<\/p>\n

            The week after the State Election Board meeting, the FBI executed a search warrant at the Fulton County election office, specifically seeking the zero tapes. The search warrant itself represents a federal judicial determination that probable cause existed to search. Fulton County has not produced a satisfactory accounting of what happened to these documents.<\/p>\n

              \n
            1. Democrat Opposition to Election Audits<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

              A pattern election integrity advocates find telling: Democrats have consistently used legal action to delay, defund, or block full forensic audits of the 2020 election. A \u201c\u201c\u2014as distinguished from the limited hand recounts most states conducted\u2014would involve independent examination of ballot chain of custody, machine logs, cast vote records, envelope signatures, and precinct-level data.<\/p>\n

              No jurisdiction in the United States has completed a full forensic audit of the 2020 presidential election. In every jurisdiction where serious audit efforts have been launched, Democrat attorneys general or allied groups have filed litigation to impede them. Critics ask, \u201cIf you\u2019re confident in the result, why fight the audit?\u201d<\/p>\n

              Democrat AGs have also collectively challenged Trump\u2019s executive order requiring proof of citizenship for voter registration, filing suit to block it. This resistance\u2014to verification measures that most democracies consider standard\u2014strikes election integrity advocates as its own form of evidence.<\/p>\n

              Part II: Serious but Unconfirmed Allegations<\/p>\n

              The following allegations have been raised by researchers, analysts, or investigators and are reported here as claims that merit investigation. They have not been confirmed by courts, federal law enforcement, or independent forensic auditors (yet). So-called election integrity reporters in the legacy media have not bothered to investigate these troubling issues. They are presented because they are being actively investigated or because the underlying data patterns have not received adequate official explanation. Note: There are many other credible allegations besides the below that need to be investigated.<\/p>\n

              Read more Acting AG Blanche: Anti-ICE Agitator Will Be Arrested For Threating Agent During NJ Riot<\/a><\/p>\n

                \n
              1. Statistical Anomalies in the 2020 Vote\u2014Unexplained, Not Disproven<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                A team of scientists and engineers at election-integrity.info has published analyses of 2020 vote time-series data claiming to identify statistically improbable vote spikes\u2014large batches of ballots reported in short windows heavily favoring Biden\u2014that they argue cannot be explained by normal counting patterns. They also claim to have found instances of \u201cnegative votes\u201d appearing in time-series data, which should be mathematically impossible.<\/p>\n

                Status: These analyses have not been independently replicated or accepted by mainstream statisticians. Election officials attribute large vote spikes to the batch reporting of mail ballots. The \u201cnegative vote\u201d claims may reflect data-entry artifacts or reporting methodology. However, no official body has conducted the granular time-series audit that would definitively address these claims. Unconfirmed\u2014merits independent statistical review.<\/em><\/p>\n

                  \n
                1. Wisconsin Voter File Algorithm<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                  An analysis published in American Thinker in April 2025 claimed that a newly discovered algorithm embedded in Wisconsin\u2019s voter file constitutes evidence of criminal election fraud, allegedly manipulating registration data in a systematic pattern.<\/p>\n

                  Status: This claim has not been verified by Wisconsin election officials or independent computer scientists with access to the underlying data. The Wisconsin Elections Commission disputes it. Unconfirmed\u2014requires independent forensic examination of the voter file.<\/em><\/p>\n

                    \n
                  1. ActBlue \u201cSmurfing\u201d\u2014Foreign Donors Using Straw Americans<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                    Beyond the confirmed Fifth Amendment invocations and congressional investigation, some analysts : foreign money flowing into ActBlue via thousands of small donations made under the names of unwitting or fictitious American donors\u2014a practice known as \u201csmurfing.\u201d Data published at electionwatch.info purports to show state-by-state patterns of anomalous small-dollar donations. One Arizona state senator filed a whistleblower complaint making specific allegations along these lines.<\/p>\n

                    Status: The congressional investigation is active, and this specific mechanism is under subpoena. The pattern data is suggestive but has not been verified through forensic banking analysis. Partially confirmed as an investigation target\u2014specific smurfing allegations unconfirmed pending investigation.<\/em><\/p>\n

                      \n
                    1. Chinese Source Code in Voting Machines<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                      Allegations have circulated\u2014amplified by Rasmussen polling commentary\u2014that Chinese-origin source code was found embedded in digital voting machines used in U.S. elections.<\/p>\n

                      Status: No federal agency has publicly confirmed this finding. The claim appears to originate from researchers without access to machine firmware through official channels. The DHS\u2019s Albert intrusion detection system was reportedly subject to failures during the 2020 cycle, which raises cybersecurity questions, but this does not confirm Chinese code insertion. Unconfirmed. Serious enough to warrant official investigation with full transparency.<\/em><\/p>\n

                        \n
                      1. CCP Influence Operations in the 2020 Election<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                        Reporting from Just the News and others has alleged that intelligence analysts suppressed findings about Chinese Communist Party interference in the 2020 election\u2014favoring Biden\u2014and that the NSA intercepted communications involving foreign government discussions about routing money to U.S. campaigns.<\/p>\n

                        Status: That China preferred Biden over Trump in 2020 is assessed by the intelligence community. The specific allegations about suppressed intelligence and money routing have not been confirmed through declassified documents or prosecutions. Former CBS reporter Catherine Herridge has amplified related reporting. Partially confirmed as an assessment (China preference); specific money-routing and suppression allegations unconfirmed.<\/em><\/p>\n

                          \n
                        1. USAID Laundering into the 2024 Biden Campaign<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                          Allegations have been published claiming USAID funds\u2014U.S. taxpayer money routed through NGOs\u2014were used to support the 2024 Biden-Harris campaign operation, effectively constituting illegal government funding of a political campaign through a laundering mechanism.<\/p>\n

                          Status: As a result of DOGE discoveries, USAID was dramatically restructured under the Trump administration, in part over concerns about politicized spending. Specific documentation of funds flowing to the Biden campaign has not been verified through official audit or prosecution. Unconfirmed\u2014active area of government review.<\/em><\/p>\n

                            \n
                          1. Pakistan and Foreign National Voting<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                            Reports from Gateway Pundit and allied outlets have alleged that Pakistani nationals who have never set foot in the United States have nonetheless appeared on American voter rolls and may have cast ballots.<\/p>\n

                            Status: The mechanism by which this could occur at scale is not established. Individual instances of foreign national registration are documented (see Part I), but systematic Pakistani voting is unconfirmed. Unconfirmed.<\/em><\/p>\n

                              \n
                            1. The Directional Pattern: All Fraud Benefits Democrats<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                              One of the most rhetorically powerful arguments made by election integrity advocates is that virtually every confirmed or alleged instance of election fraud benefits Democrats, not Republicans. If fraud were random, one would expect roughly equal distribution. The pattern, they argue, is not random.<\/p>\n

                              Status: This argument is worth taking seriously as a statistical observation. Confirmed fraud cases (Pennsylvania, Minnesota, Connecticut, etc.) trend Democrat\u2014which helps explain Democrat resistance to the SAVE Act. Democrats support illegal aliens voting in US elections, support and incentivize ballot harvesting, and employ lawfare to fight virtually all Republican-sponsored election integrity laws, cleaning up voter rolls, and conducting full forensic audits of election results. All of this increases the probability of election fraud. When it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, it\u2019s probably a duck.<\/p>\n

                              Concluding Thoughts<\/p>\n

                              Whether one accepts all, some, or none of the unconfirmed allegations above, the documented problems alone\u2014dirty voter rolls, noncitizen registrations, exploitable mail ballot systems, resistance to audits, foreign money concerns\u2014provide ample justification for the SAVE Act\u2019s core requirement: prove you are a citizen before registering to vote in a federal election. The SAVE Act is a logical response.<\/p>\n

                              The American people apparently understand the issue quite well. The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 59 percent of U.S. voters believe it\u2019s likely that there will be widespread cheating that will affect the outcome of this fall\u2019s congressional elections. And more than 80 percent across all political parties and racial groups support the SAVE Act.<\/p>\n

                              Opponents (elected Democrats and their activist base) argue this will disenfranchise legitimate voters who lack documentation. Proponents respond that the same logic would argue against requiring ID to board a plane or open a bank account\u2014that the burden of documented citizenship is minimal and the protection it provides is substantial. Every other major democracy requires some form of citizenship verification for electoral participation.<\/p>\n

                              The ~80 percent public support for the SAVE Act reflects a simple intuition: in a self-governing republic, the franchise belongs to citizens. Verifying citizenship is not suppression. Resisting verification\u2014when the voter rolls demonstrably contain ineligible registrations\u2014is not protection of democracy. It is protection of a system that benefits those who prefer less scrutiny.<\/p>\n

                              The American people deserve to know that their elections are clean. The SAVE Act is a start. Full forensic auditing capacity, completed without legal obstruction, would be the finish. Neither should be controversial in a country that claims to believe in democracy.<\/p>\n

                              Read more Blue States Begin Scaling Back \u2018Free\u2019 Healthcare Benefits for Illegal Aliens<\/a><\/p>\n

                              After all, don\u2019t the Democrats want to \u201csave our democracy\u201d?<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                              American self-governance rests on one indispensable foundation: that elections reflect the will of eligible citizens, counted accurately and administered\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":161,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[29],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-162","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-election-integrity"],"yoast_head":"\nWhy the SAVE Act Matters - Urban Economy news<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=162\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Why the SAVE Act Matters - Urban Economy news\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"American self-governance rests on one indispensable foundation: that elections reflect the will of eligible citizens, counted accurately and administered\u2026\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=162\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Urban Economy news\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-05-29T07:44:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"12 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/?p=162#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/?p=162\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/be7753cb687f443815cc81e8407f68ad\"},\"headline\":\"Why the SAVE Act Matters\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-29T07:44:39+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/?p=162\"},\"wordCount\":2495,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/?p=162#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/11849bedc803a8d5373d1d288b2ceb07.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Election Integrity\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/?p=162#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/?p=162\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/?p=162\",\"name\":\"Why the SAVE Act Matters - Urban Economy news\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/?p=162#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/?p=162#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/11849bedc803a8d5373d1d288b2ceb07.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-29T07:44:39+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/be7753cb687f443815cc81e8407f68ad\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/?p=162#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/?p=162\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/?p=162#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/11849bedc803a8d5373d1d288b2ceb07.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/11849bedc803a8d5373d1d288b2ceb07.jpg\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":1440},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/?p=162#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Why the SAVE Act Matters\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"Urban Economy news\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/be7753cb687f443815cc81e8407f68ad\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/urbaneconomynews.com\\\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Why the SAVE Act Matters - Urban Economy news","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=162","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Why the SAVE Act Matters - Urban Economy news","og_description":"American self-governance rests on one indispensable foundation: that elections reflect the will of eligible citizens, counted accurately and administered\u2026","og_url":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=162","og_site_name":"Urban Economy news","article_published_time":"2026-05-29T07:44:39+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"12 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=162#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=162"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/#\/schema\/person\/be7753cb687f443815cc81e8407f68ad"},"headline":"Why the SAVE Act Matters","datePublished":"2026-05-29T07:44:39+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=162"},"wordCount":2495,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=162#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/11849bedc803a8d5373d1d288b2ceb07.jpg","articleSection":["Election Integrity"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=162#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=162","url":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=162","name":"Why the SAVE Act Matters - Urban Economy news","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=162#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=162#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/11849bedc803a8d5373d1d288b2ceb07.jpg","datePublished":"2026-05-29T07:44:39+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/#\/schema\/person\/be7753cb687f443815cc81e8407f68ad"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=162#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=162"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=162#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/11849bedc803a8d5373d1d288b2ceb07.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/11849bedc803a8d5373d1d288b2ceb07.jpg","width":2560,"height":1440},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=162#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Why the SAVE Act Matters"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/","name":"Urban Economy news","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/#\/schema\/person\/be7753cb687f443815cc81e8407f68ad","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com"],"url":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/162","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=162"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/162\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/161"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=162"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=162"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=162"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}