{"id":1879,"date":"2026-09-07T07:07:11","date_gmt":"2026-09-07T07:07:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=1879"},"modified":"2026-09-07T07:07:11","modified_gmt":"2026-09-07T07:07:11","slug":"the-log-cabin-republicans-are-democrats-in-conservative-drag","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/urbaneconomynews.com\/?p=1879","title":{"rendered":"The Log Cabin \u2018Republicans\u2019 are Democrats in \u2018Conservative\u2019 Drag"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

In my previous article, I \u201csnatched the wig\u201d (look it up) off the Log Cabin Republicans, exposing that they were not moving away from transgender advocacy out of some sense of righteousness or goodwill for the public\u2014or the country.<\/p>\n

Read more Trump Super PAC Launches $10 Million Ad Blitz to Boost Paxton in Texas<\/a><\/p>\n

They have reworked themselves, like a drag queen putting on a MAGA hat, to seem less crazy, more conservative, and more in line with cultural currents that are rejecting the transgenderism cult just to protect their homosexual advocacy (Read: moral disintegration).<\/p>\n

Their move against the T is not a principled reform but CYA (Cover Your A\u2013) of the highest order.<\/p>\n

A drag queen wearing a MAGA hat is still a drag queen.<\/p>\n

And drag queens, or any other form of family-destroying anarchy, are not conservative. In fact, there is nothing conservative about a movement claiming to promote homosexuality as a static identity deserving of the same rights and privileges as other identity groups.<\/p>\n

The Log Cabin \u201cRepublicans\u201d are Democrats in \u201cconservative\u201d drag, and we should stop pretending otherwise.<\/p>\n

Despite all the evidence, the Log Cabin \u201cRepublicans\u201d protest that they are a conservative movement that wants to provide a place for homosexual Republicans (?) to speak out for their brand of identity politics while fighting for other conservative priorities.<\/p>\n

Putting aside their ongoing promotion of anti-natural law and natural-rights sexual deviancy, let\u2019s confront and dismantle the lie that the Log Cabin \u201cRepublicans\u201d are a conservative group in every other way.<\/p>\n

To rebuff any rebuttals, let\u2019s establish that they do claim to be conservative.<\/p>\n

Hemminger writes in his \u201cNo More T\u201d Op-ed:<\/p>\n

Fifty years ago next year, Log Cabin Republicans was founded on a simple conviction: that gay Americans who believe in limited government, individual liberty, and equality deserve equal protection under the law and a voice inside the Republican Party. From the start, Log Cabin Republicans grounded its advocacy in constitutional principles\u2014equal protection, limited government, and individual freedom.<\/p>\n

Are the Log Cabin GOP really committed to limited government, individual liberty, and equal protection under the law?<\/p>\n

That phrase \u201cunder the law\u201d covers a lot of devilish subtleties. For the last ten years, the Democrat Party has attempted to pass the so-called \u201cEquality Act\u201d in Congress, which would further corrupt the Civil Rights Act corpus of legislation to include homosexual conduct and cross-dressing as civil rights. Log Cabin pundits are all in on the \u201cEquality Act.\u201d<\/p>\n

Expansion of protected classes in civil rights jurisprudence ensures the growth of government overreach. While we should all resist invidious discrimination, the federal government\u2019s crude \u201cCivil Rights Acts\u201d enforcement, including forced quotas and affirmative action, has frustrated liberty without combating bigotry. Before his assassination, Charlie Kirk argued for repealing the Civil Rights Act. Free enterprise, freedom to choose, and capitalism (true limited government) provide the best protections for consumers. Conservatives have long understood this. However, the Log Cabin \u201cRepublicans\u201d are all in favor of big government \u201cnon-discrimination\u201d interventions. They have no problem with violating freedom of association as well as freedom of speech and freedom of commerce, i.e., pursuit (not guarantee) of happiness.<\/p>\n

Other rights that conservatives care about include the right of children to be raised in natural families, as well as the committed protection of public order for their future. The Log Cabin \u201cRepublicans\u201d not only support redefinition of marriage but also support homosexual couples taking children away from their natural parents. How is it \u201climited government\u201d when homosexual activists (Republican as well as Democrat) use the state to punish churches, charities, and small businesses for not celebrating their homosexual activities as a matter of preference or conscience?<\/p>\n

Read more U.S. Strikes Three Iranian Oil Tankers After Missile Attacks on Navy Warships<\/a><\/p>\n

The Log Cabin \u201cRepublicans\u201d support a nationwide ban on \u201cconversion\u201d therapy for minors. In other words, they traffic in the lies of the Left, propagandizing that reparative or restorative therapy harms individuals, including children. Father Richard Sullins of the Ruth Institute has expertly debunked these claims. Recently, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Chiles v. Salazar that states cannot prevent therapists from providing restorative therapy to children on the grounds of freedom of speech.<\/p>\n

Not only do the Log Cabin statists oppose key principles protected by the United States Constitution, but they can\u2019t even get with the times legally!<\/p>\n

Here\u2019s another problem: they claim to have ended their transgender advocacy, yet look at their goals within the Decriminalization section under the \u201cIssues\u201d tab of their website:<\/p>\n