One of America’s most remarkable immigration stories belongs to Asian families. For decades, they have invested extraordinary effort in their children’s education, producing generations of high achievers who have excelled at elite universities and in the professions.
Read more Morning Greatness: Trump Names Staff Secretary Will Scharf as New White House Counsel
Yet alongside this success lies a growing paradox.
Some of the most prominent young figures in progressive politics today are the daughters of Asian immigrants, including politicians such as Michelle Wu and Francesca Hong. Raised in households that prized discipline, competition, and obedience, they have become vocal advocates of democratic socialism, identity politics, and an expanded role for government. Their parents often came to America seeking freedom, economic opportunity, and escape from authoritarian societies. Some had lived under political repression themselves. Yet their daughters have embraced political movements their parents often struggle to understand.
This contradiction deserves more than the familiar explanation that “young people tend to be liberal.”
The Tiger Mom, immortalized by Amy Chua, has become a symbol of relentless discipline: perfect grades, endless practice, admission to elite universities. Compared with Western parenting, which often emphasizes individuality and self-expression, the Tiger Mom prizes achievement, sacrifice, and self-control.
If the goal is to produce successful students, the model has been extraordinarily effective.
But success is not the same as independence.
The Tiger Mom excels at raising children who know how to succeed within institutions. She is less successful at raising children who question them.
From an early age, many Asian children learn how to identify the rules, understand what teachers reward, anticipate what admissions officers value, and optimize every stage of their education. They become experts at finding the correct answer. Eventually, they begin to assume that every important question has one.
That habit works beautifully in competitive schools. Institutions reward students who master existing rules. The problem comes when the institutions themselves begin promoting a narrower ideological culture.
Many first-generation immigrants unknowingly pass down not only diligence but something more subtle: deference.
In many Asian families, authority is rarely questioned. Children are taught to respect teachers, obey parents, avoid conflict, and complete every assignment without complaint. The educational system rewards compliance far more consistently than skepticism. Questioning authority is seldom treated as a virtue.
The role of the Tiger Dad deserves attention as well. Many Asian fathers express love primarily through criticism rather than praise. A child scores 99 and hears, “Why not 100?” A scholarship is followed by, “There are better schools.” Daughters often grow up hearing comments such as, “She’s not beautiful, but she’s smart,” or “She’s obedient.” Such remarks are usually well-intentioned, but they encourage children to seek validation from external approval rather than internal confidence.
That emotional dynamic matters.
When these children enter American schools, they encounter a very different culture. Teachers encourage self-expression, praise students generously, and consciously build self-esteem. For children who rarely experienced emotional affirmation at home, school offers something beyond education. It offers acceptance.
As a result, many absorb not only knowledge but also the moral vocabulary of the institutions that finally made them feel valued. Their political beliefs are shaped not simply by intellectual persuasion but by the deep human desire to belong.
Read more Jason Arday, Barack Obama, and the Making of Myths
At the same time, many American universities have moved steadily leftward over the past several decades. On issues such as race, gender, capitalism, immigration, and American history, many campuses have developed increasingly narrow definitions of acceptable opinion. Students remain legally free to disagree, but social and professional costs can accompany dissent.
For students who have spent their lives trying to satisfy institutional expectations, this environment rarely encourages resistance. Instead, it rewards adaptation.
They learn the new language. They master the new moral standards. They quickly recognize which opinions earn approval and which invite criticism. Yesterday they competed for perfect SAT scores. Today they compete for ideological perfection.
This is the paradox of the second-generation Asian American overachiever.
They are intensely competitive, yet often deeply conformist. They are highly intelligent, yet may spend surprisingly little time asking the most important question of all: If everyone around me believes something, does that make it true?
First-generation immigrants bear some responsibility for this outcome.
They devoted enormous energy to helping their children succeed but comparatively little to explaining why they left their homelands. They taught their children how to excel within institutions, but not why institutions sometimes deserve skepticism. They passed down the survival habits they learned under authoritarian systems without passing down the historical experiences that made those habits necessary.
The greatest inheritance immigrant parents can leave their children is therefore not another SAT tutor, another violin lesson, or another Ivy League acceptance letter.
It is an understanding of freedom.
Tell your children why you left.
Tell them what ideological conformity looks like.
Tell them what happens when an entire society is expected to repeat the same political slogans.
Tell them that experts can be wrong, prestigious institutions can lose their way, and majorities can surrender their judgment.
Above all, teach them that freedom does not mean always having the right answer. It means having the courage to question the answer everyone else accepts.
The Tiger Mom has done an extraordinary job teaching her children how to compete.
The next lesson is harder.
Teach them not only how to win but also what communist authoritarianism is—and why freedom is worth defending.
Read more London, the Red Telephone Box, and a Civilization Losing Its Memory
